PROJECT THEO
The protocol looked right.
Finding why it isn't
is the actual work.
A personalized written analysis built from your exact protocol data. Identifies what is limiting progress and what the research suggests adjusting next.
Choose Your TierYou have been running a protocol.
It should be working.
The researchers who get the most from this audit have already done the reading, made adjustments, and still cannot find the specific variable holding results back.
The compound is rarely
the problem.
Most stalls are caused by a wrong diagnosis of which variable is limiting progress. A researcher who has identified the wrong bottleneck adds the right compound to the wrong problem. The plateau does not move. The compound gets blamed.
The framework gives you the logic. It cannot tell you which specific variable in your specific protocol is the one limiting your results right now.
That is what the audit is built to find. You submit your protocol through a structured questionnaire. The output is a written analysis of what the evidence in your case suggests and what the most rational next adjustment looks like.
A 10 to 15 page written
analysis. Not a template.
Every section is written from your specific inputs. Built around one question: what is actually limiting your results right now, and what does the research suggest doing about it.
Protocol structure review
Whether your protocol design makes sense for your goal and which phase the data suggests you are in.
Compound match analysis
Whether the compounds you are running match the problem being solved and where redundancy or conflict may exist.
Failure point identification
The most likely root cause of the current stall based on your full protocol history and symptom pattern.
Dosing and timing review
Where timing, frequency, or dose burden may be working against the expected response.
Four to six week adjustment path
The highest-priority change to make next and why it makes more sense than adding another variable.
Bloodwork interpretation
Available with Detailed and Priority tiers. Labs read alongside the full protocol, not in isolation.
The videos explain the system.
The audit shows where yours is breaking.
The free content is built for the general case. The audit applies the same diagnostic logic to your specific phase, your specific protocol history, your specific bottleneck. If you are still stuck after watching the relevant videos, a general framework has reached its limit. That is when a personalized read becomes the more rational next step.
Three tiers. Same complete analysis.
Difference is turnaround speed and bloodwork. After purchase you receive the intake questionnaire.
What to know
before you submit.
Not medical advice, a prescription, or a sourcing service. It is a written educational analysis of the protocol data you submit. Everything is framed as what the research suggests based on your specific inputs.
After purchase you receive an intake questionnaire covering your protocol, goal, what changed, what stalled, and what symptoms appeared. Detailed and Priority tiers also accept bloodwork.
Yes. The audit identifies which compound categories and research-based timing or dosing corrections make the most sense for your phase and bottleneck. It does not include sourcing, vendor guidance, or medical advice.
The videos are built for the general case. The audit applies that same logic to your specific case. A general framework reaches its limit when two researchers with identical protocols have completely different root causes for the same stall.
Usually yes. The pattern of what worked and what did not is exactly what isolates the real bottleneck. The questionnaire asks for that full history specifically.
Standard and Detailed deliver in 5 to 7 business days. Priority delivers within 48 hours of completed submission.
The framework gives you
the logic.
The audit shows which variable in your specific protocol is limiting results right now.
Choose Your Tier